Mutual funds versus blackjack
Dear Mark,
I've always felt that being in the stock market is the same
as playing blackjack. They're both gambling. I might as well
do something I love instead of giving some investment company
my money to flush down the toilet. You're in gambling, do
you agree? Ralph G.
Your analysis of comparing the stock market to blackjack
is way off the mark. Entering the world of blackjack as a
profession (investment) takes enormous work and you're playing
against, if not for a better term, a financial institution
that not only has a built-in house edge but is there exclusively
to beat you. Come on, Ralph. How many people do you know who
win at blackjack-consistently? Compare that to what a market
like NASDAQ has done over the past 10 years. Gone up, up,
up! Give me a dart board and the Wall Street Journal and I
would have averaged 12% over the past 30 years.
I'm sure your next argument will be that of becoming a sophisticated
card counter. Sorry, it's not worth spending hours in smoke-filled
casinos, performing tedious mental calculations and disguising
your play so you won't be thrown out-just for a one percent
edge.
Finally, Dr. Edward Thorp, who wrote the classic Beat the
Dealer was, as a professional, in the investment business.
Even he conceded it is far easier to make money in the financial
markets than at blackjack. Unfortunately, gambling is a poor
man's way of investing, and even for the poorest of investors,
a $500 wager in a mutual fund is a much better bet.
Dear Mark,
When the state lotto gets over $20 million here in California,
my mother wants me to buy $10 worth of lottery tickets and
then mail them back to her in Michigan. Is it legal for me
to mail her the tickets? Roberta G.
Congratulate your mother for me, Roberta, for waiting till
the lottery reaches $20 million before she purchases her tickets.
Because the true odds of hitting the California lottery are
18,009,460 to 1, she's actually playing the game smart.
As for the legality of sending tickets through the mail, sorry,
Roberta, using the United States Postal Service for this particular
ruse is against the law. Millions do it, unknowingly, but
I have yet to hear of one individual who has been charged,
or convicted for sending lottery tickets by mail; NOT ONE!
But if you want to play it straight, it's perfectly legal
to use a service like Federal Express or Airborne Express.
Where individuals and businesses have gotten into trouble
is soliciting you to play a foreign lottery. Ever get one
of those plain white envelopes enticing you to play the Canadian
Lottery, Roberta? Don't! It's against the law, again for the
same reason. U.S. Postal regulations state that using the
U.S. mail to solicit people to play the lottery, or even to
distribute any type of lottery material, is strictly illegal.
By the way, there's a reason why their envelope on the outside
doesn't give away what's on the inside. With a Canadian Lotto
return address, it would be confiscated by the USPS before
it reached you.
Dear Mark,
On a recent trip to Branson, Missouri, I stopped along the
way in Kansas City and gambled for the first time. I was surprised
to see both loss limits and two-hour cruises. Is that common?
Bill K.
The loss limits and cruise times are in place to prevent
problem gamblers from spending more than they can afford to
lose. Currently Missouri is the only state with these restrictions.
It is the wisdom of the Missouri legislature that by setting
limits you won't blow your trip bankroll, you will have time
to get religion and still have enough money to see Wayne Newton
in Branson.
next article »
« back
|
